What Does Mine Waste Valorization Look Like for Mine Rock?

  • June 23, 2026

Image

What Does Mine Waste Valorization Look Like for Mine Rock?

As integrated mine planners and closure practitioners, we work with mine rock stockpiles daily. Most operators see mine rock stockpiles (MRSs) as a risk to be managed when the mine shuts down; a liability, not an asset.  At Okane, we understand that MRSs must be thoughtfully designed, constructed, and managed to reduce operational risks and environmental liabilities, but we also recognize that they present opportunities.

Mine rock valorization refers to the belief in assigning value to stockpiles and reimagining them as assets. When addressing MRSs as part of the integrated mine closure plan, the valorization of mine rock should be considered.

Mine rock valorization opportunities could  include:

  • evaluating the material potential for carbon mineralization;
  • shaping the land for post-mining land use, and
  • understanding alternative economic applications for the mine rock itself.

Viewing stockpiles as potential sources of value has been identified by Schafler et al. (2026) as part of an opportunity they call “divest-to-invest,” in which mining companies sell older assets to fund future-facing investments. If divestment is essential to the business cycle, demonstrating the potential value in MRSs is a responsible path forward. So why are mine rock stockpiles excluded from asset registries?

In this month’s Conversation on Closure, we explore some examples of how mine rock could be valorized through carbon storage or reprocessing as part of closure, turning a traditional mining byproduct into a source of long-term economic and environmental value.

The Role of Geochemistry in Understanding Stockpile Value

Before we look at specific pathways for valorization, it helps to understand an analytical discipline that connects them. Geochemistry is how we determine whether a mine rock stockpile is a liability, an asset, or both.

From a design perspective, geochemistry informs the stockpile design and closure approach. It informs what a stockpile is made of, how reactive those materials are, and what that reactivity means for water treatment and waste management decisions.

The reactivity of a material is a key factor in designing effective mine waste management strategies and informs the need for near-term and long-term water treatment. Geochemistry shapes how we design and build the stockpile, as well as how it performs while in place.

Geochemistry also quantifies opportunity, describing the economic potential of a stockpile, the required extraction method, and the existing environmental liability. Geochemistry can also be a valuable communication tool. Geochemical assessment, when described in accessible language, can help people appreciate not only the environmental risks of a stockpile but also the opportunities to achieve a better closure outcome or post-mining land-use value. When we can put numbers to both risk and opportunity, the conversation with operators, regulators, and investors changes.

Leveraging Mine Rock for Carbon Sequestration

One pathway for valorization runs through carbon. British Columbia’s Ministry of Mining and Critical Minerals (MCM) recently published a report on the “Consideration of Ecosystem Carbon in Mine Reclamation” (2025). The report frames carbon as an important indicator of reclamation success and highlights the value of tracking carbon in reclaimed ecosystems (MCM, 2025). That work focuses on biological carbon, the kind that accumulates when plants grow, and organic matter builds in soil on reclaimed land. Post-mining MRS design can integrate geomorphic landform design principles that enable the cultivation of reclaimed ecosystems.

Mine rock stockpiles may offer another carbon management pathway through carbon mineralization, a geochemical process in which carbon dioxide (CO2) reacts with certain rock types to form stable carbonate minerals. In 2020, Geoscience BC led the Carbon Mineralization Potential Project for British Columbia (Mitchinson et al., 2020) with the goal of producing an inventory of ultramafic rock localities that includes both their mineralization potential (for carbonation) and their abundance. Some successful pilot-scale projects have demonstrated the potential for mineral carbon storage in mafic and ultramafic rocks; however, several unknowns remain to be addressed (Nisbet et al. 2024). 

One of the projects our research and development team is actively investigating is whether Okane’s Advanced Customizable Leach Columns (ACLCs) could be used to study carbon sequestration and carbon mineralization rates across multiple physical and geochemical settings. ACLCs provide a middle ground for carbon sequestration experiments, where field conditions may be more accurately simulated to understand relationships that may enhance carbon sequestration and mineralization rates.

While these initial studies are with tailings rather than mine rock, if we can understand the CO2 sequestration potential of carbon mineralization in tailings storage facilities, it may open opportunities to explore the potential in mine rock stockpiles. For more on this work, see our Conversation on Closure regarding Carbon Sequestration Potential of Tailings and Mined Rock.

Reprocessing Mine Rock for Closure Value

Another pathway for the valorization of mine rock is reprocessing. In our experience, systematic reprocessing of mine rock stockpiles is still rare but is an active area of exploration in the industry.

In the United States of America, the U.S. Department of the Interior has released several orders related to valorization of mine waste, including Executive Order 14241, Immediate Measures to Increase American Mineral Production, and Secretary’s Order 3436, Unlocking Critical and Strategic Minerals from Mine Waste, Cutting Red Tape, and Restoring American Dominance in Strategic Mineral Production. As of September 2025, the U.S. Geological Survey has awarded nearly $3 million in cooperative agreements to state geological surveys to study critical minerals in the materials left over from mining at active and legacy sites (U.S. Geological Survey, 2025). At the Prospectors & Developers Association of Canada (PDAC) this year, we met some members of the North American Iron team, who are developing a pig iron production project that reclaims and processes Minnesota’s historic iron stockpiles (North American Iron, 2026).

A practice we see regularly in mine and closure planning is the low-grade ore stockpile. We have seen mine operations stockpile marginal ore material and call it “temporary,” with plans to process it at a later date. However, because it’s considered temporary, the stockpile may not be designed or constructed through a long-term or closure lens (such as being lined or constructed with source control measures in place). In some cases, operators may never process the material, and then these temporary stockpiles, which were previously considered an asset, become an environmental liability (Nkuna et al., 2022).

To quantify value, it is critical to understand the concentration of low-grade ore in the MRS and the volume of rock. Three-dimensional modelling tools (both spatial and geological) can help evaluate volumes, footprints, geometry, and ore grade when planning and designing stockpiles. Metallurgical testing is also needed to determine how the weathered low-grade ore will react in the processing plant and if any modifications are necessary. Combined with geochemical data, such as mineralogy and elemental composition, that describe the resource and the liability, these tools can give operators a clearer picture of whether reprocessing is feasible.

In some instances, even without reprocessing, mine rock can be valorized. Almost 10 years ago, Anaconda Mining Inc. and Shore Line Aggregates entered into an agreement to ship an aggregate product made from surplus stockpiled mine rock (Anaconda Mining Inc., 2016).

Exploring the potential value in mine rock is not an excuse to defer closure planning or design. An integrated mine closure plan must first provide for safe, stable closure, but operators should not ignore the potential for second-act value extraction. As operators explore opportunities to optimize fully integrated mine and closure plans, they could uncover value by reviewing legacy geologic records, conducting additional drilling, and asking what other value opportunities could exist.

Okane’s Approach

Regulatory and permitting obligations today often require a defined geochemical characterization program to manage and quantify risks. Geochemical characterization is already an integrated process of operations. Leveraging this data to evaluate the potential for stockpile valorization should be part of the process.

Okane has worked with clients to evaluate where mine rock valorization is practical, or could present an opportunity to offset closure costs, turning an otherwise liability into an asset.

At Okane, we align early MRS design choices, such as height, slopes, and bench configuration, with long-term landform objectives, working wherever possible to preserve future value. The challenge often lies in aligning near-term operational goals to optimize mine production and extract value, with the opportunity to manage and reduce long-term asset liability through thoughtful stockpiling and placement.

At one site we work with in Ontario, Canada, the mine operator had to remove potential cover system material to access ore and extract maximum value. We are working with the operator to effectively stockpile and directly place overburden materials to preserve their value, while progressively reclaiming the site’s MRS during operations. 

When we integrate geochemical understanding and early stakeholder engagement into integrated mine closure planning, we create the conditions for MRSs to hold value beyond closure. Whether through carbon mineralization, reprocessing for mineral recovery, or thoughtful landform design that enables post-mining land use benefits, the potential for valorization increases when it is integrated into the mine plan.

To explore how an integrated approach to mine rock valorization can support your mine and closure planning, contact our team at info@okaneconsultants.com.

References

Anaconda Mining Inc. (2016, October 27). Anaconda Mining enters into an aggregates royalty agreement; monetizes waste rock. PR Newswire.

British Columbia Ministry of Mining and Critical Minerals (MCM). (2025). Consideration of ecosystem carbon in mine reclamation. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/farming-natural-resources-and-industry/mineral-exploration-mining/documents/reclamation-and-closure/consideration_of_ecosystem_carbon_in_mine_reclamation.pdf

Dictionary.com. (n.d.). Valorization. In Dictionary.com. Retrieved March 12, 2026, from https://www.dictionary.com/browse/valorization

Mitchinson, D., Cutts, J., Fournier, D., Naylor, A., Dipple, G., Hart, C.J.R., Turvey, C., Rahimi, M., Milidragovic, D. (2020). The carbon mineralization potential of ultramafic rocks in British Columbia: A preliminary assessment. Geoscience BC Report 2020-15/MDRU Publication 452, 25p.

Nisbet, H., Buscarnera, G., Carey, J., Chen, M., Detournay, E., Huang, H., Hyman, J., Kang, P., Kang, Q., Labuz, J., Li, W., Matter, J., Neil, C., Srinivasan, G., Sweeney, M., Voller, V., Yang, W., Yang, Y., & Viswanathan, H. (2024). Carbon mineralization in fractured mafic and ultramafic rocks: A review. Reviews of Geophysics, 62(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2023RG000815

North American Iron. (2026). North American Iron: Key facts. https://na-iron.com/

Nkuna, R., Ijoma, G., Matambo, T., & Chimwani, N. (2022). Accessing metals from low-grade ores and the environmental impact considerations: A review of the perspectives of conventional versus bioleaching strategies. Minerals, 12(5), 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12050506

Schafler, M., McNab, G., Morán, J. I., & Mollard, J. (2026, February 11). Global mining trends that are becoming the new normal. Canadian Mining Journal. https://www.canadianminingjournal.com/featured-article/global-mining-trends-that-are-becoming-the-new-normal/

U.S. Geological Survey. (2025, September 25). USGS supports 13 states in joint work on critical minerals in mine waste [News release]. https://www.usgs.gov/news/national-news-release/usgs-supports-13-states-joint-work-critical-minerals-mine-waste


Share this article: